Affirmative action in the US - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 5 Words: 1392 Downloads: 4 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Politics Essay Type Narrative essay Level High school Tags: American Life Essay Did you like this example? Just as numerous policies adopted in the United States, affirmative action is one that has incessantly adapted to the country’s changing needs because of its flexibility. The first concrete reference to the term appeared in Kennedy’s Executive Order 10925 which pushed to take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed without regard to race (Sowell 124). This order’s intents were furthered by the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibited discrimination more effectively and in a larger scope. In both these instances, affirmative action is seen as a means to abolish discriminatory hiring and primarily benefit African Americans in the workplace. The affirmative action that society is familiar with nowadays is a result of the Nixon administration’s established â€Å"result-oriented procedures† to incorporate larger amounts minorities and women into the workplace through target ranges rather than quotas. Over time, aff irmative action has evolved from preferential hiring by race in the workplace to prevail in higher education admissions and governmental contracting and expanding to benefits additional groups such as females and disabled persons. As a result, preferential selection has gathered much attention and been tested in Supreme Court cases across the nation, such as University of California v. Bakke and Grutter v. Bollinger, both in which it was not declared unconstitutional (Sander and Taylor). Regardless of court decisions, affirmative action remains a controversial topic that is constantly debated by the American public. Due to its success in ameliorating the situations of numerous Americans, there is a large amount of support for affirmative action that has taken form across the nation. The predominant political parties associated with this view are the Democratic and Liberal Parties. Prominent democratic politicians in concurrence with affirmative action plans include Bill Clinton a nd Jesse Jackson, both who believe the drawing back of affirmative action will result in a higher number of institutions no longer considering minorities in the application process, resulting in the re-segregation of the public and reduction of opportunities. One of the main arguments for preferential selection is that it ensures the inclusion of minorities that have been left behind in the past due to their systemic exclusion from opportunities, a belief greatly supported by African American Congressman Charles Rangel (Sowell 120). Likewise, factions supporting affirmative action state that the advantages given to minorities motivate them to become successful. Female enrollment in the workforce and in educational institutions has surpassed that of males since the extension of affirmative action programs towards their gender. The League of Women Voters and National Organization for Women have continually pushed to keep preferential hiring and acceptance for the aforementioned reason s, working to help women realize their potential and inspire them to pursue higher education and a secure job in their respective fields of preference. To add to the implements of affirmative action creating a better society, interest groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored Persons take the stance that preferential hiring promotes diversity, which in turn yields a country more tolerant of variety through assimilation. With this in mind, supporters see affirmative action as an integral part of reforming the U.S. society to one free of segregation and plentiful in tolerance. Conversely, there is an opposing viewpoint which believes that affirmative action has perpetuated more harm than benefit to the American public. The Conservative and Republican parties ideologically uphold such a belief, abiding by the orthodox view that equality of results should not overwhelm the equality of opportunity as well as hold a st rong belief on the protestant work ethic. Republican politicians that have established themselves opponents of affirmative action include George W. Bush and Ward Connerly. Bush extends his views against affirmative action to the belief that quota systems are unjust as well as unconstitutional, but believes in the promotion of diversity in modern America. According to Ayres, Republican Ward Connerly expresses his belief that extending preferences on the basis of race and gender goes against Martin Luther King Jr.’s prospect of a color-blind America. Connerly is the leader of the American Civil Rights Institute, an interest group that aims to demote the effects of affirmative action in the United States (Ayres). However, there is a plurality of Liberal Democrats that take stances against affirmative actions as well, such as John Kerry and Leland Yee. They believe that affirmative action makes it so that those of a minority are equally or more likely to be accepted into institut ions than individuals of a majority who are of higher caliber. California Senator Yee took an anti-affirmative action approach after receiving a letter from Asian Americans emphasizing the negative impact that California’s Constitutional Amendment 5, one that negates the anti-affirmative Proposition 209, would yield upon them. Conservative interest groups against preferential hiring or acceptance such as the Central for Equal Opportunity claim that minorities hired with preferential treatment are more likely to be treated in a derogatory fashion in workplaces and universities (Clegg). Criticism given by their competitive colleagues causes preferentially accepted workers or students to doubt their confidence and negatively affects their performance and efforts, ultimately harming both themselves and the institutions they perform under. Individuals who choose to pursue their dreams should independently strive to accomplish what they set out to do and feel as though they were th e ones one who accomplished that goal through hard work, not through being part of a desirable minority accepted to fulfill an establishment’s quotas. Another argument proposed against affirmative action is that it essentially promotes the consideration of race and gender in a society that is aiming for equality. Although there are traces of racism lingering in the modern U.S., opponents of preferential acceptance believe that its society is no longer collectively racist and does not need affirmative action to pull the minorities back into the competition for success. IMO One of the main arguments from this point of view is that some individuals accepted into prestigious universities under the quota system receive opportunities that they are unprepared for, and thus, cause them to be inherently disadvantaged in programs with high demands. Affirmative action, in its attempts to decrease discrimination, has harmed other individuals as well as those affected by such polici es, resulting in its widely debated controversy. One divisive view of affirmative action is the need for augmentation of diversity in order to expose individuals to a heterogeneous public. To promote diversity to appeal to those who desire to end discrimination as well as appeal to those who dislike racial preference and seek to group individuals by their abilities, prestigious schools should seek partnership with those that contain higher percentages of minorities so that both groups of students in their respective schools intermingle and influence one another. With this compromise, unprepared minorities are no longer ushered into high-status environments which they are not prepared to enroll in, yet diversity is achieved through the partnership of differently composed institutions. Another possible alteration of affirmative action to minimize the political rift and find middle ground to assist those who are truly depraved is the adoption of class and background-based considerat ion in addition to that of race and gender. By promoting preferential hiring solely by race, gender, and minority status in order to reduce segregation, institutions unintentionally promote stereotypes that no longer hold true in modern times. Certain genders and races are not as exclusively disadvantaged as they are grouped to be—for example, there are ambitious well-off daughters of successful Hispanic doctors and lawyers that may apply to the same school as more academically able yet deprived sons of Asian refugee fishermen. In such a compromise, the target ranges for minorities deter the effects of segregation while increased consideration for class shifts the sole focus on race and gender to a society that is not simply divided by color, but one that believes in creating equal opportunity for its public’s well-being. Works Cited Ayres, B. Drummond, Jr. Foes of Affirmative Action Form a National Group. New York Times. Arthur Sulzberger Jr., 16 Jan. 1997. Web. 28 Sept. 2014. Clegg, Roger. Affirmative Action. Center for Equal Opportunity. Center for Equal Opportunity. Web. 28 Sept. 2014. Hutchinson, Earl Orafi. State Senator Helps Set Dangerous Precedent for Affirmative Action. Huffington Post. Huffington Post, 24 April. 2014. Web. 28 Sept. 2014. Sander, Richard, and Stuart Taylor, Jr. Mismatch. Basic Books, 2012. Print. Sowell, Thomas. Affirmative Action Around the World. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004. Print. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Affirmative action in the US" essay for you Create order

Should Teen Underage Be Banned - 845 Words

Should teenagers allow to drink just because they turn eighteen years old and now legally adults? In the U.S when an individual arrived at eighteen they are viewed as a grown-up. Being an adult as per the law which mean develop enough to vote, purchase cigarettes, and even sign up for the army. The purpose of lowering the drinking age to eighteen has been talked about for a few years. Right when drinking underage shouldn’t be permitted because it’s unsafe, when it comes to health complications regards to well-being of others and can be taken under circumstances where it can be excessively over used. Everybody should think what would happen by the chance that we change the drinking age to eighteen. Approximately 4,700 teens each year die from alcohol. Give or take drinking had regularly creatures at a young age. One of the risks that is one to drink alcohol at a young age this person is in more serious danger by become an alcoholic. In schools today teens are more pressu red to try alcohol because it is what the â€Å"cool† kids are doing. In addition an interchange inspiration to keep the drinking age of twenty-one is that drinking open deliberations the reaction time besides make it where the buyer had less control or his or her body. For instance, male who gets to be intoxicated is most inclined to assault a young woman. As per the United Stated Department of Health and Human Services it assessed that 90% of college rapes involve the use of alcohol by the assault and theShow MoreRelatedLowering The Drinking Age From 21 Essay1214 Words   |  5 PagesUnderage drinking. It’s all the rage in this generation. Youths everywhere are subjecting themselves to excessive amounts of alcohol at illegal ages, and the consequences are evident all around us. Every year over 5,000 kids under the age of 21 die from alcohol abuse, 1 in 5 10th graders will resort to binge drinking, and alcohol continues to damage developing teen brains (Let’s Stop Teen Drinking Tragedies). While they may not be seen in night clubs in bars, people between the ages of 18 and 21Read MoreUnderage Smoking And The United States Essay1518 Words   |  7 PagesUnderage Smoking in the U.S. Shockingly, there are 3.5 million middle and high school students smoking cigarettes in the U.S. (Leatherdale Vu, 2011). As we all know, smoking is a horrible habit which affects many of the body’s systems such as the circulatory and immune systems. Underage smoking is an even more serious problem as it affects teenagers’ health and influences more young people to smoke, stopping it is possible with a good tracking system (Qi, 2015). The most obvious problem of underageRead MoreEssay on Effects of Alcohol Advertisements on Youth1149 Words   |  5 Pages â€Å"Two teens dead and another hospitalized after a single car crash and police say that drinking and driving was the cause,† the news reporter continued. â€Å"Fifteen is no age to die!† Will exclaimed. â€Å"Fifteen is no age to drink and drive either,† added Oskar. â€Å"What persuades these ‘little doves’ to drink?† Susan asked. â€Å"I would blame the alcohol advertisements for that,† answered Oskar. â€Å"Hahaha....are you out of your mind? How can advertisements persuade someone to drink? You can surely think of somethingRead MoreCommunication Media Arts High School. . . Should Teens1775 Words   |  8 PagesCommunication Media Arts High School Should Teens Be Able To Purchase Violent Video Games? Bryan Dorsette Dr. Williams English AP 18 May 2017â€Æ' Table of Contents Abstract 2 Introduction 3 History 3 Problem Statement 4 Factual Data 5 Case Studies 5 Resolution 6 Conclusion 7 Works Cited 9 â€Æ' Abstract In the U.S., retail stores will not allow underage teens or minors to purchase violent or mature rated video games without a guardian. 97 percent of teens in the U.S., ages 12-17 play video gamesRead MoreTobacco Smoking1372 Words   |  6 Pagespublic places such as Britain and the United States. However, to prevent the costs of smoking from rising and causing a larger number of deaths around the U.S, strict measures would need to be taken. I believe that the production of cigarettes should be banned across the U.S to prevent any diseases from occurring which would save thousands of lives. As mentioned before, numerous diseases have been associated with smoking. Diseases such as lung cancer, mouth cancer, and throat cancer (WHO) are justRead MoreUnderage Tanning Law838 Words   |  3 PagesMany teens today feel pressured to live up to societys standards. They believe that perfect hair, flawless makeup, designer clothes, and bronze skin is required. This is where tanning beds come into play. About 29.5 percent of teenagers use indoor tanning devices. (Health Day News). However, is the warm, golden glow going to be achievable any more? State Representatives are considering new restrictions, and changing existing laws, in regards to teen tanning. These new commands will ban teens fromRead MoreCosmetic Surgery : Becoming More Common817 Words   |  4 Pagesmore and more teens are trying to look like the latest celebrities. Celebrities like Kim Kardashian, and Kylie Jenner are making cosmetic surgery the â€Å"It† thing. Cosmetic surgery should not be given to teen s. Cosmetic surgery is risky and should not be used as a quick fix for self-esteem and body image. Cosmetic surgery is the procedure of enhancing the patient’s appearance. Teens seeking cosmetic surgery is becoming more common. There are certain surgeries that are common in teens that get cosmeticRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book The Outsiders 1106 Words   |  5 Pagesfor people to have more compassion for the lower class teens such as the â€Å"Greasers† (Hinton). In 1986 South Milwaukee, Wisconsin challenged The Outsiders because they felt that the alcohol, drug abuse, and characters from broken homes. The book has been challenged by many different schools, libraries, and church groups. A school district in Boone, Iowa because the school board felt as if the book embellished violence, obscenities, underage drinking and smoking. The most recent challenge was in 2001Read MoreThe Drinking Age Should Be Lowered From 21950 Words   |  4 Pagesmany American citizensâ₠¬â„¢ starting to change their views on the drinking age there has become more positive views than negative. With these opportunities given to us it is believed that the drinking age should be lowered from 21 to 18. There is so much controversy on whether or not the drinking age should be lowered. This idea of lowering the drinking ages really comes when into play when kids turn 18 and are now seen as a legal adult in society. At the beginning of their adulthood, the first real tasteRead MoreThe Minimum Drinking Age Act1211 Words   |  5 Pagesof eighteen you can fight and die for your country, but you cannot legally drink or purchase alcoholic beverages. Others find it hard to believe that there are people who want people under the age of twenty-one drinking. The important question is: should the drinking age be lowered to eighteen instead of remaining at twenty-one? The legal drinking age is the age at which a person can consume or purchase alcohol. These laws cover a wide range of issues and behaviors, addressing when and where alcohol

Is It Ever Right to Break Law free essay sample

â€Å"If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it; he is obligated to do so. † Thomas Jefferson Assignment: Is it ever right to break a law? Law is an ancient procedure. It refers to a system of rules , set by a society to maintain order and protect persons and property. With evolving time its procedure of implementation has varied. It is written by the legislators, enforced by the police and supported by the court and prison systems. Its smooth implementation depends upon the functioning of a righteous legal system. However. certain rules tend to jeopardize independence, the social structure and creativity in any form. . I strongly believe that breaking such laws is justiciable as they restore liberty , bring about a positive social change and give recognition to human creativity which is above fanaticism. Man’s independence is of paramount importance and its jeopardy needs to be dealt with firmly. We will write a custom essay sample on Is It Ever Right to Break Law? or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page History is replete with such examples and every leader of such a revolution is a Messiah of sorts. The Civil disobedience movement led by Mahatma Gandhi aimed at breaking and opposing laws imposed by the British rule. The salt satyagraha, the burning of foreign goods and the call to leave India, was definitely breaking laws. But then the implication was of far greater significance as this paved the way for the freedom of India from the British rule . This movement further inspired so many freedom struggles in the world and quenched the thirst for independence. So breaking such laws was surely justified. At times it becomes very necessary to break a law which directly or indirectly aims at hindering social progress. Slavery was a social crime and without breaking it mankind could not have forgiven itself. The Civil War was all about the abolition of slavery. Martin Luther King , the champion of this cause had rightly stated that An individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for the law. The horrid untold tales of this malady could not have been eradicated had the laws of subjugation imposed by the whites not broken. Surely the abolition led to a society where equality prevailed and color had no room for creating distinction. The positive social outcome is visible today like never before, with a black man residing in the White House. It is also justified to break laws imposed by religious groups out of sheer fanaticism. Such laws jeopardize expression of art, literature and any form of creativity. The religious fundamentalists impose ban on any persons who dare to be liberal, writers who dare to expose some dark secrets of the tenets of their religion and sportspersons who defy dress codes and so on. Salman Rushdi, noted painter M. F Hussain and Tasleema Nasreen have become victims of such harsh laws. Daring to break and go against such rules cannot be termed as anything but justified. It is their choice of expression and no law is deemed above their creativity. Laws are to make life comfortable and not to hinder progress of man in any kind. It is the basic religion of mankind to stand above all narrow beliefs and usher in an era of freedom, social equality and real dignity to creative minds. So whenever unjust laws have hindered or attempted to do so, it has been only justified to break such laws. If man fails to do so , it would mean the failure of humanity. Surely such a state can never be thought of!